|
|
Making The Network Work:
A MANIFESTO FOR ONLINE COMMUNITIES
If we believe that the Internet and development in cyberspace should
enhance rather than restrict democracy, enable us to be active citizens
- and that everyone should have an opportunity to participate -
these are draft proposals for a manifesto for online communities.
In summary:
1. Every citizen, regardless of their economic circumstances, should
be able to share the benefits of the Information Age - including
better communications, greater participation, electronic life long
learning, and e-commerce. To achieve this they should have access
to local community technology centres, plus public online forums
and services to create an online community. The centres will provide
technical support and help 'on the ground', the forums will be 'virtual
spaces' for online communities related to localities.
2. Centres and online communities should be easy to find - signposted
locally, and through a national gateway.
3. Public support should be available, particularly in low-income
neighbourhoods, where the market is unlikely to provide facilities
on a sustainable basis without public funding.
4. Development of centres and online communities should be piloted
through pathfinder projects, with community participation.
5. There should be a network and support for the local champions
and partnerships who will develop the centres and online communities.
6. A virtual resource centre should be developed to provide sources
of advice for local champions and partnerships, and a neutral space
online for discussion of the development of centres and online communities.
The draft manifesto in full:
1. Every citizen, regardless of their economic circumstances, should
be able to share the benefits of the Information Age - including
better communications, greater participation, electronic life long
learning, and e-commerce. To achieve this they should have access
to local community technology centres, plus public online forums
and services to create an online community. The centres will provide
technical support and help 'on the ground', the forums will be 'virtual
spaces' for online communities related to localities.
The centres will be 'real places' that provide people with access
to the Internet, digital broadcast and online services, and opportunities
to learn more about their potential. Centres have a proven track
record, particularly in the US where there is a strong network.
The forums, with associated Web pages of community information,
will be online communities that provide people with the information
and communication systems necessary to enhance the social, economic
and environmental well-being of their communities.
Both centres and online communities will be needed. Without physical
access centres, many people will not be able to get online or use
the Internet. Centres can also provide a focus for the development
of high quality local content and services.
The centres will be the libraries, schools and community centres
of the digital age - sometimes located in these existing facilities,
sometimes in other places where people naturally gather, sometimes
purpose built. They will be designed to be unintimidating, welcoming
and convenient.
A support programme associated with each centre should provide
training and advice for individuals, small businesses and community
organisations who wish to develop their own use of digital services,
ranging from basic Internet use to the development of community
media services.
The online community systems will be the local public service broadcasters
of the digital age, combining news, information and interactivity.
They will develop in a number of ways. Some may be developed by
the centres, others by local authorities or non-profit organisations.
The minimum services provided should include signposting to local
online information, public forums, and scope for self-publishing
and broadcasting.
2. Local technology centres and online communities should be well
signposted both locally and nationally.
A national signposting system for online communities should enable
people to find the physical location of centres, and also the location
of online communities on the Internet. This could take the form
of a search engine and map, providing the equivalent of local signposts
to libraries, and media programme listings.
3. Public support should be available, particularly in low-income
neighbourhoods, where the market is unlikely to provide facilities
on a sustainable basis without public funding. In many well-off communities, centres, forums and other services
will be developed by public bodies, partnerships and social entrepreneurs.
However, in some low-income neighbourhoods - where need is greatest
- there will not be sufficient local resources to develop these
facilities and sustained Government intervention will be necessary. In order to ensure centres meet local needs, development should
be undertaken through a process which enables the participation
of community interests, and the formation of appropriate partnerships.
This would allow everyone to become active digital citizens.
Government support should be longer term - not simply for pilots
- and designed to help centres become sustainable. How this can
be achieved may depend upon local circumstances, and will require
some testing and evaluation, as described below.
4. Development of centres, forums and other services should be
piloted through pathfinder projects, with community participation. The centres should build on the experience of telecentres and resources
centres in the UK, and community technology centres in the US. They
would take this well-tried model into the digital age where broadcast
and Internet services converge. The forums and other services similarly would draw on the experience
of community networking and community media pioneers, and combine
that with professional skills from public broadcasting and online
services. In order to achieve this, it will be necessary to research, develop
and trial models for centres, and provide a central 'virtual resource
centre' containing advisory materials.
The local pilot development should be undertaken in association
with public, private and community organisations. The presumption
in developing centres should be that they will be locally controlled,
and designed to ensure the maximum participation of local interests.
Developing these guidelines will be one task for the pathfinder
programme.
5. A network and support for local champions and partnerships Centres and online communities will only be developed if there
are local champions and partnerships of local interests to support
them. Regional programmes should be established to identify, train and
support these champions. They will be the catalysts and development
staff for local centres, or people who wish to develop some aspect
of a centre, forums and other services. Local partnerships formed by the champions should be able to access
material from the virtual resource centre, and call upon support
from central development staff.
The centre, local partnerships and local champions should develop
a 'learning network' which if possible draws upon the professional
expertise in the online industry.
6. The virtual resource centre
Pioneers in the development of local centres and online communities
in the UK, US and elsewhere have started to share their experience.
What is now needed is work to assemble 'best practice' , as understood
by practitioners in the field, and to test what works and what doesn't
in the pathfinder projects proposed above.
www.makingthenetwork.org/
www.partnerships.org.uk/cyber/manifest.htm
Sources:
- Online communities guru Howard Rheingold - archive of live chat
- The US network for community technology centres
- The Internet Society's Societal Task Force is promoting 'Internet for Everyone'
- How to create local online communities at Communities Online and Partnerships Online
- Background to development of the manifesto
- Map of online communities in the UK
- BBC Online Communities Conference, and news of further BBC developments
|